Curated navigational map — not a census of inequality
Gender, Representation & Missing Knowledge: what happens when the record is incomplete?
This is an invitation to follow absences as evidence without pretending every absence has the same cause. Across Clyde Street, women can be missing from origin stories, archives, datasets, professional rooms, institutional programmes or public recognition. Elsewhere the problem is representational: who gets to speak, whose work is named, what a dataset can see, or what silence allows to pass as normal.
The rows ask where the gap is showing up. The columns ask what Keith does when he notices it: name it, search, check the source limits, make material public, repair a story, challenge a culture or institution, build another route — or leave the gap unresolved when the evidence does not warrant more.
Hover or focus a heading for its meaning. Hover a source link for the exact-cell explanation; click or tap it to hold the full source card open and choose whether to return to Clyde Street or continue through a longer article.
The full card will show what the source is about, why it sits in the exact crossing you chose, what evidential or ownership limit has to travel with it, and where you can go next.
| WHERE is the gap or representation problem? ↓ | WHAT does Keith do when it becomes visible? → | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|